The long-running and bitter dispute over the awarding of the UK National Lottery licence has finally reached the High Court in London. A trial opened this

The long-running and bitter dispute over the awarding of the UK National Lottery licence has finally reached the High Court in London. A trial opened this week in which billionaire media proprietor Richard Desmond is suing the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) for up to £1.3 billion, alleging that the 2022 procurement process was seriously flawed.
The case puts the conduct of the UK’s top gambling regulator under intense scrutiny and threatens a massive bill for the public purse. The legal battle centres on the UKGC’s decision to award the fourth National Lottery licence, the UK’s largest public sector contract, to Allwyn, ending Camelot’s 30-year incumbency.
Desmond, who was a rival bidder through his entity The New Lottery Company (TNLC), has made a series of explosive allegations against the regulator. His legal team is expected to argue that:
The UK Gambling Commission has vowed to “robustly defend” its decision-making. The regulator has consistently maintained that its process was fair and has previously described Desmond’s bid as “fanciful,” claiming it scored poorly in the rigorous evaluation. The current operator, Allwyn, has joined the UKGC in defending the case, arguing that its own reputation is at stake.
The regulator’s CEO, Andrew Rhodes, recently described the National Lottery as “a national institution, a national treasure and one that we at the Gambling Commission take great pride in being a custodian of.”
The legal battle has already proven to be incredibly expensive. Recent figures show the UKGC’s lottery-related legal bills have soared from £400,000 to more than £13 million in a single year, largely due to this dispute.
The stakes are now even higher. If Desmond’s lawsuit is successful, any damages awarded by the court would first be drawn from the National Lottery’s fund for good causes, which distributes around £30 million to charities and community projects each week. Should that fund be insufficient, the UK taxpayer could ultimately be left to foot the bill. The trial is one of the most closely watched legal cases of the year and its outcome will have profound implications for both the UKGC and the future of public procurement in the UK.