• The government of Mexico has proposed a massive increase in its federal gambling tax, seeking to raise the rate on Gross Gaming Revenue ( GGR) from 30% to a punitive 50%.
• The proposal is part of a wider government effort to generate new revenue to reduce the national budget deficit, targeting gambling as a “socially risky” product.
• The industry has reacted with alarm, warning that a 50% tax rate is commercially unsustainable and will inevitably drive a huge portion of the market to unregulated black market operators.
• The proposed tax is a “Special Tax on Production and Services” ( IEPS), which is applied on top of corporate income tax and other local levies, creating a huge cumulative burden.
• The move follows similar, less extreme tax hikes in European markets like the Netherlands, which have reportedly led to a decrease in state tax revenues and a surge in illegal play.

The regulated gambling industry in Mexico is bracing for a potentially catastrophic blow, after the country’s Finance Minister, Édgar Amador, proposed a massive hike in the national gambling tax. The plan would see the Special Tax on Production and Services (IEPS) levied on Gross Gaming Revenue ( GGR) surge from its current level of 30% to a staggering 50%.

The proposal, which has sent shockwaves through the industry, would place Mexico among the highest-taxed gambling jurisdictions in the world and has sparked immediate and grave concerns about the future viability of the legal market.

The Government’s Rationale: Fiscal Urgency

The Mexican government has justified the proposed tax hike as a necessary measure to generate additional revenue and help reduce a budget deficit that is projected to be 4.1% of GDP. The proposal seeks to align the tax treatment of gambling with other products that are considered socially harmful and are subject to high rates of “sin tax,” such as tobacco and sugary drinks.

The new tax package also includes a proposed 8% levy on certain types of video games, signalling a broad-based move to extract more revenue from the digital entertainment sector.

Industry Warns of a ‘Dutch Disaster’

The industry has reacted with universal alarm, warning that a 50% GGR tax is commercially unsustainable. The IEPS is applied to an operator’s revenue before other taxes are calculated, including a 30% corporate income tax and various local and municipal levies. The cumulative effect, critics argue, would destroy profit margins and make legal operation impossible for all but the largest international firms.

The most serious concern is that the move will trigger a mass exodus of players to the unregulated black market. Offshore operators, who pay no Mexican taxes and have no player protection obligations, would be able to offer far better odds and bonuses, making the legal market uncompetitive.

Industry observers are pointing to the recent “cautionary tale” of the Netherlands, where a much smaller tax increase has been blamed by the country’s own regulator for a decline in legal gambling revenue and a surge in the black market.

An Accelerated Timeline

The proposal is moving through the legislature on an accelerated timeline, with key debates in the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate scheduled for October. If approved, the new rate would take effect in early 2026. The industry is now facing a very short window to lobby against a tax that it believes could destroy the legal market and undo years of progress in one of Latin America’s most important jurisdictions.