A new, well-intentioned gambling policy from YouTube is threatening the viability of the platform's entire poker content ecosystem, according to a growing
A new, well-intentioned gambling policy from YouTube is threatening the viability of the platform’s entire poker content ecosystem, according to a growing chorus of prominent creators. The policy, rolled out earlier this year to protect underage viewers, has been described as “devastating” for channels that focus on the skill and strategy elements of the game, with some reporting that their ad revenue has collapsed by as much as 90%.
“I truly believe that if nothing changes, then we are looking at the end of poker content creation on YouTube,” warned creator Nick Eastwood.
The core of the issue lies in YouTube’s reliance on automated moderation systems. These tools appear to be incapable of differentiating between a video that is actively promoting an online casino and one that is providing educational content, such as analysis of a tournament hand or a tutorial on bankroll management.
When a video is incorrectly flagged as a gambling promotion, it is age-restricted. This has two immediate and damaging effects: ad revenue is slashed, and, most critically, the video is removed from YouTube’s powerful recommendation algorithm, making it almost impossible for it to reach a new audience. As creator Brad Owen put it bluntly, the policy “nukes the views.”
Creators have also highlighted major inconsistencies in how the rules are applied, with some poker videos being flagged while similar ones are not. At the same time, high-risk content, such as live streams of slot machine play, often seems to avoid the same restrictions.
The appeals process has also been heavily criticised as being ineffective and automated. Sports bettor Captain Jack Andrews reported that a five-year-old educational video on his channel was flagged, and his appeal against the decision was denied in just three minutes, suggesting no human review took place.
The poker community is now calling on YouTube to adopt a smarter and more nuanced approach. Creators have stressed that they support the goal of protecting younger viewers, but they argue that the current system is a blunt instrument that is causing immense collateral damage to legitimate content.
Their proposals include a clear policy distinction between skill-based games like poker and games of pure chance, better user-side age verification systems rather than blanket content restrictions, and a transparent appeals process with genuine human oversight. Without such changes, many fear that a rich and valuable educational community is at risk of being wiped off the platform.
