Lithuania’s gambling regulator has handed a €330,600 fine to Baltic Bet for systemic failures in money laundering prevention, marking another blow for the Entain owned operator as the country continues its aggressive compliance crackdown.
The Lithuanian Gaming Supervisory Authority, known locally as the LPT, has issued a significant financial penalty of €330,600 to Baltic Bet. This decision follows an investigation into the company’s internal procedures regarding the prevention of money laundering. The watchdog found that the operator had consistently failed to adhere to the strict due diligence requirements mandated by national law, specifically regarding the identification of customers and the verification of where their gambling funds originated.
According to the official statement from the LPT, Baltic Bet accepted various customer deposits without conducting the necessary background checks to confirm the identity of the account holders. Furthermore, the firm was found to be lacking any substantive evidence regarding the source of funds for several high-volume players. Under the Lithuanian Law on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing, all licensed operators must monitor player behaviour to ensure that betting activity remains consistent with a user’s known financial profile.
The fine, though substantial, was reportedly reduced by the regulator because Baltic Bet chose to cooperate fully during the investigation phase. The operator, which runs the prominent Optibet brand and is a subsidiary of the London-listed Entain group, now has the option to appeal the decision in court. This is not the first time the company has run into trouble with the LPT; only two years ago, it was hit with a smaller fine for violating betting regulations through the unauthorised cancellation of winning slips.
The Lithuanian gambling landscape has undergone a period of intense transformation recently. As of late 2025, new responsible gaming rules raised the minimum gambling age to 21 for all sectors and introduced mandatory risk assessments. The LPT has made it clear that while they offer training and consultations to firms, they will not hesitate to use their enforcement powers against those who bypass the rules. This proactive stance was further evidenced by a separate January 2026 probe into Betsson regarding sports sponsorship branding, which was resolved after the operator agreed to change its league naming rights.
This latest enforcement action against Baltic Bet is a clear signal that the Lithuanian regulator has moved past the era of gentle warnings. For a subsidiary of a global powerhouse like Entain to be caught out on basic identity checks and source of funds verification suggests a persistent gap between high-level corporate policy and boots on the ground implementation. In my ten years covering the European markets, I have seen this pattern before: a large group acquires a local operator but fails to integrate rigorous compliance culture quickly enough to satisfy a hawkish national regulator.
The timing of this fine is particularly significant given the shadow cast by the Olympic Casino scandal in 2025, where nearly €8.4 million was levied over the Stepukonis embezzlement case. That landmark ruling shifted the goalposts in the Baltics, effectively ending any leniency for "formal" or "tick box" monitoring. The LPT is now demanding real-time, proactive intervention. For Baltic Bet, a €330,600 fine is a painful reminder that the cost of compliance is always lower than the cost of failure, especially in a jurisdiction that is increasingly acting as the EU’s laboratory for strict gambling oversight.
Looking ahead, we should expect Entain to conduct a thorough audit of its Baltic operations to avoid further reputational damage. The Lithuanian authorities have demonstrated that they are happy to cooperate with firms that admit their faults, but they are equally ready to wield the big stick if the same mistakes recur. For other operators in the region, the message is loud and clear: if you cannot prove where your customers' money is coming from, the regulator will eventually come for yours.
