Skip to content
iGaming Times

Choose your emails

Which emails would you like?

Independent industry intelligence in your inbox. We will email you a link to confirm the emails you ticked, and every email carries a one-click unsubscribe link. Each list can be left on its own.

Lesson 2 of 7 · 16 min

How the Money Moves

A deposit step by step, custody and the hot wallet, the assets and why stablecoins on fast chains won, on-ramps and off-ramps that leave identities, chain choice, fees, and the regulated version.

Fact-checked 23 September 2026 by iGaming Times editorial team · 13 sources

In this lesson

  • Describe a crypto deposit and withdrawal and what differs from a card payment
  • Explain that a crypto-native casino is custodial and what hot and cold wallets mean for risk
  • Explain why on-ramps and off-ramps are where the segment meets identity and friction
  • Contrast the regulated operator's provider-based model with the native model

A deposit, step by step

A customer at a crypto-native casino clicks deposit, chooses an asset and a network, and is shown an address. They send the asset from their own wallet or from an exchange. The transaction is broadcast to the network, included in a block, and after a number of confirmations the casino credits the balance. The whole process takes from seconds to an hour depending on the chain, costs the customer a network fee that ranges from fractions of a cent (Solana charges a base fee of 5,000 lamports per signature) to several dollars or more depending on the chain and the moment, since on a busy network such as Ethereum users outbid each other to get their transactions included, and involves no bank, no card scheme and no payment processor unless the customer bought the crypto for the purpose.

Everything that is different about crypto casino payments follows from that description: the operator controls the receiving address, the network is public, the fee is set by congestion rather than by a scheme, and the customer's side of the transaction is whatever wallet they chose to use.

Custody: who holds what

A crypto-native casino is custodial. The customer's deposit goes to an address the operator controls, and the customer's balance is an entry in the operator's database, exactly as at a regulated casino. The customer does not hold the funds while playing; the operator does. The word "crypto" makes some customers assume otherwise, but a custodial operator that fails or disappears takes the balances with it.

The operator's custody arrangements are therefore the first thing to understand about any platform. The standard architecture is hot wallets, connected to the platform and holding enough to pay withdrawals, fed from cold storage that holds the bulk of customer funds offline. The hot wallet is the main target for attackers, and platforms have lost tens of millions of dollars in single attacks: in September 2023 the FBI attributed the theft of about $41 million in virtual currency from Stake.com to North Korea's Lazarus Group, which it also held responsible for thefts from CoinsPaid and Alphapo, two crypto payment companies, earlier that summer. A regulated operator's customer funds are subject to a regulator's rules: in Britain, for example, a remote licensee must hold them in a separate client bank account and tell customers whether they are protected if it becomes insolvent. A crypto casino's equivalent is a key-management policy that nobody outside the company is likely to audit unless its licence requires it.

On-chain casinos are the exception: the smart contract holds the funds, the customer's stake and the house bankroll sit in code that anyone can read, and the operator cannot run off with them, though the contract can have bugs that let someone else.

The assets

Bitcoin was the original casino currency and is still accepted everywhere, but it is slow, with its design built around a new block roughly every ten minutes, expensive to move at busy times and volatile, so it has become a deposit asset more than a playing balance.

Ethereum and the tokens on it, and the faster chains built alongside it (Tron, Solana, BNB Chain, Polygon and others), carry most of the traffic, because they are quick and cheap and because the stablecoins run on them.

Stablecoins, dollar-pegged tokens issued against reserves, are what many balances are now held in. USDT on Tron is the workhorse of the segment: on 22 September 2026 Tether reported about $92 billion of its $183 billion USDT in circulation on Tron, more than on any other chain. It is fast and it is a dollar that behaves like a dollar, but it is not free: fees are paid in TRX, and a USDT transfer paid for by burning TRX cost between about $1.60 and $4.30 in 2024 and 2025 before the network halved its energy price at the end of August 2025. The issuer can freeze tokens at specific addresses and has done so for law enforcement: in one 2024 US case Tether froze about 200,000 USDT and later transferred it to a government-controlled wallet under a federal seizure warrant. That is a significant change in the segment's exposure to authority.

Everything else. Casinos list dozens of smaller coins because their customers hold them. Each is a small liquidity and volatility problem, which is why many platforms convert them to a stablecoin balance on deposit.

An operator that holds customer balances in a volatile asset carries the price risk on its own book unless it hedges, and the treasury function at a large crypto casino is closer to a trading desk than to a cashier.

On-ramps and off-ramps

Most customers do not hold crypto before they want to gamble with it. The on-ramp, buying crypto with a card or a bank transfer, is therefore part of the product, and casinos embed third-party on-ramp providers that sell the customer the stablecoin and send it to the casino's address in one flow. Those providers are regulated in most major markets: in the United States businesses that exchange virtual currency are generally money transmitters under FinCEN's rules, and in the EU, since 30 December 2024, a crypto-asset service provider must ensure that each crypto transfer it sends carries the sender's name, address and identity details. They verify identity, and they can refuse transactions they consider too risky. The on-ramp is where the crypto casino meets the same payments friction as everyone else, and where its customers' identities most often become knowable.

Off-ramps, converting winnings back to fiat, are the customer's problem, usually solved through an exchange, which is also regulated and also asks who they are. A customer who deposits through a regulated on-ramp and withdraws to a regulated exchange has left an identity at both ends of a supposedly anonymous transaction.

Chain choice and fees

Which network a casino supports is a commercial and a compliance decision. Fast, cheap chains keep customers; chains with strong analytics coverage and issuer freeze powers keep regulators calmer; chains associated with laundering (privacy coins, or networks with weak analytics) attract the customers a casino does not want and the attention it does not need. Many platforms have dropped privacy-focused coins for that reason, and regulation is pushing the same way: from 10 July 2027 the EU's anti-money laundering regulation bars crypto-asset service providers from keeping accounts that allow transactions to be anonymised, including through anonymity-enhancing coins.

Fees are paid by the customer on deposit and, often, by the operator on withdrawal, which makes withdrawal fees a cost line that scales with volume and spikes when a network is congested. Platforms can batch withdrawals and route them to the cheapest chain to manage it.

Payouts

Withdrawals are where the crypto casino's speed is the product. A regulated operator's withdrawal can take days, gated by verification, fraud review and the banking system; a crypto casino's can take minutes, because the operator sends tokens to the address the customer gives. Speed is also the risk: an operator that pays out in minutes has minutes to catch a stolen deposit, a bonus-abuse ring or a laundering pattern, and the controls that do so (withdrawal holds above thresholds, address screening, velocity checks) are the ones that slow the product down. The tension between fast payouts and financial-crime controls is the segment's central operational problem, and lesson five returns to it.

The regulated operator's version

A licensed casino that adds crypto does almost none of the above itself. A payment provider gives the customer an address, receives the crypto, converts it to fiat at a quoted rate and settles fiat to the operator; withdrawals run in reverse. The operator never holds a token, its balance sheet stays in fiat, and its regulator sees a payment method run by a third-party provider. In Britain a licensee adding crypto must notify the Gambling Commission, say whether crypto-assets are accepted directly or through a third party, and review its anti-money laundering risk assessment; the Commission notes that the two routes carry different risks. The customer gets a faster deposit and, where the regulator permits, a crypto withdrawal to a verified wallet. This model is what "crypto" means in a regulated market, and it is the one suppliers, regulators and licensed operators are actually building toward.

What to take from this lesson

A crypto-native casino is custodial: it controls the address, holds the balance and carries the hot-wallet risk. Stablecoins on fast chains carry most of the volume and have brought the segment one step from the banking system rather than outside it. On-ramps and off-ramps are regulated and leave identities at both ends. Fast payouts are the product and the risk. The regulated version outsources all of it to a licensed payment provider and never touches a token.

Key terms

Custodial
The operator holds the customer's funds at addresses it controls; the balance is an entry in its database. True of crypto-native casinos, not of on-chain ones.
Hot wallet
A wallet connected to the platform holding enough to pay withdrawals, fed from offline cold storage. The main target for attackers on a crypto casino.
On-ramp
A service that sells crypto for fiat and sends it to the casino's address in one flow. Usually a regulated business that verifies the buyer's identity and can refuse transactions it considers too risky.
Network fee
The cost of a transaction on a chain, which rises with congestion. Fractions of a cent on some chains, several dollars or more on others at busy moments.
Conversion at the boundary
The regulated model: a licensed provider receives crypto, converts to fiat and settles fiat to the operator, which never holds a token.

Key takeaways

  • The operator controls the receiving address, the network is public, and the fee is set by congestion rather than a scheme.
  • A crypto-native casino is custodial: the customer's balance is a database entry and the hot wallet is the main target for attackers.
  • USDT on Tron is the workhorse: fast, a dollar that behaves like a dollar, not free to move, and issued by a company that can freeze it.
  • A customer who deposits through a regulated on-ramp and withdraws to a regulated exchange has left an identity at both ends.
  • Fast payouts are the product and the risk; every control that catches a stolen deposit slows the product down.

Sources

The legislation, regulator material and research this lesson was checked against.

  1. FBI Identifies Lazarus Group Cyber Actors as Responsible for Theft of $41 Million from Stake.com, Federal Bureau of Investigation, accessed 2026-09-23
  2. FBI Identifies Cryptocurrency Funds Stolen by DPRK, Federal Bureau of Investigation, accessed 2026-09-23
  3. Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice, licence conditions 4.1.1 and 4.2.1: protection of customer funds, Gambling Commission, accessed 2026-09-23
  4. Blockchain technology and crypto-assets, Gambling Commission, accessed 2026-09-23
  5. United States Seeks to Forfeit 200,000 Tether (USDT) Cryptocurrency, U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Ohio, accessed 2026-09-23
  6. Application of FinCEN's Regulations to Certain Business Models Involving Convertible Virtual Currencies (FIN-2019-G001), Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, accessed 2026-09-23
  7. Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 on information accompanying transfers of funds and certain crypto-assets, Article 14, EUR-Lex, accessed 2026-09-23
  8. Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for money laundering or terrorist financing, Article 79, EUR-Lex, accessed 2026-09-23
  9. Transparency: Tether tokens in circulation by chain, Tether, accessed 2026-09-23
  10. Proposal: Decrease the transaction fees (TIP issue 789, energy unit price 210 to 100 sun), TRON protocol (GitHub), accessed 2026-09-23
  11. Fees, Solana documentation, accessed 2026-09-23
  12. Gas and fees: technical overview, ethereum.org, accessed 2026-09-23
  13. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, bitcoin.org, accessed 2026-09-23

Check your understanding

4 questions · answer them all, then check.

  1. 1. Who holds a customer's funds while they play at a crypto-native casino?

  2. 2. Why has USDT on Tron become the segment's working unit?

  3. 3. Where does a supposedly anonymous crypto casino customer most often become identifiable?

  4. 4. What does the regulated operator hold on its balance sheet when it accepts crypto through a licensed provider?

Sign in to track your progress through the course.

Cookie Preferences

Choose which cookies you want to accept. Essential cookies are required for the website to function properly.

Required

Necessary for the website to function. Cannot be disabled.

Help us understand how visitors interact with our website.

Used to deliver relevant advertisements and track ad performance.

Remember your preferences and settings for a better experience.