Visualize Closes Its eCOGRA Deal, Putting BMM Testlabs and eCOGRA Under One Private Equity Owner
By Antonina Tupikova · Founder, iGaming Times3 min read
Seven months after buying BMM Testlabs, the New York investment firm Visualize has completed its purchase of eCOGRA, creating a testing and certification group it says holds licences or accreditations in more than 800 jurisdictions. The price of neither deal has been disclosed.
- The Visualize Group, a New York private investment firm founded in 2023, said on 28 September that it had completed its acquisition of the London-based testing lab eCOGRA from Hanover Investors, three months after announcing the deal on 30 June
- eCOGRA joins BMM Testlabs, the Las Vegas lab Visualize bought in March, in what the firm calls a gaming testing, inspection, certification and compliance (TICC) platform with licences or accreditations in more than 800 jurisdictions
- Financial terms were not disclosed for either acquisition, and the closing followed what Visualize calls "customary regulatory approvals and clearances", which it did not name
- Both labs keep their brands and chief executives, Martin Storm at BMM and Will Shuckburgh at eCOGRA, and Visualize says each will remain an independently accredited business with its own standards, methodologies and decision-making
- The deal builds a second consolidator in a compliance sector where Gaming Laboratories International (GLI) has bought NMi Gaming, SIQ, iTech Labs and Trisigma since 2017
Visualize Completes the Second Half of Its Testing Roll-Up
The Visualize Group has completed its acquisition of eCOGRA, it announced on Monday 28 September from New York and London. The transaction, first announced on 30 June, "closed following receipt of customary regulatory approvals and clearances", according to the release, which does not say which regulators were involved. eCOGRA now sits alongside BMM Testlabs, which Visualize bought earlier this year, and the firm says the combined platform "now holds licenses or accreditations in over 800 jurisdictions, including nearly every jurisdiction in the world with legal, regulated gaming". Financial terms were not disclosed.
The seller is Hanover Investors Management, an alternative investment firm founded in 2002 that bought eCOGRA in December 2021, according to Private Equity Wire. Macquarie Capital advised Hanover and eCOGRA on the sale and Willkie Farr & Gallagher acted as their legal adviser; Weil, Gotshal & Manges and Greenberg Traurig advised Visualize, according to the June announcement. Visualize also said it intends to extend its employee ownership programme to eCOGRA's staff.
Visualize describes itself as a private investment firm that makes "concentrated, high-conviction investments in mission-critical, services-based companies, many of which operate in regulated markets". It was founded in 2023, is headquartered in New York and is led by its founder and managing partner, C. C. Melvin Ike, a former managing director at Blackstone, according to its March release. It says it is backed by university endowments, foundations and family offices. eCOGRA is its second investment in gaming testing, after BMM, according to the June announcement.

Two Labs With Different Footprints
BMM, founded in 1981 and headquartered in Las Vegas, tests land-based and online products including Class III, Class II, VLT, AWP, iGaming, sports betting and lottery systems. When Visualize completed that purchase on 4 March, BMM said it employed more than 700 people in 16 offices and held more than 700 regulatory and related business licences, with offices in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, India, Italy, Macau, Romania, Peru, Poland, Singapore, Slovenia, South Africa and Spain. Visualize called that deal "the first-ever control acquisition of a major regulated gaming testing laboratory". Its price was also undisclosed.
eCOGRA is younger and narrower. Founded in 2003 as a self-regulatory body for online gambling, it now tests and certifies online casino software and systems and says it serves regulators in more than 50 jurisdictions; its website puts its accreditations at 47. It holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation from the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) as a testing laboratory for Great Britain, Greece, Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland, and is an approved alternative dispute resolution provider for the Gambling Commission in Great Britain, according to its site. Visualize's June release said BMM's expertise "spans the full testing and certification spectrum", while eCOGRA's is "focused on the digital gaming segment".
Martin Storm, BMM's chief executive, said the two labs "share a common purpose: giving players, operators, and regulators confidence in the credibility of the broader gaming ecosystem", and that the combination would let them invest in "technology and capacity". Will Shuckburgh, eCOGRA's chief executive, said it gives eCOGRA "the scale and resources to serve our customers even better". Ike called the closing "an important step toward building a generational business in regulated gaming". Leaders of both labs are due to appear together this week at the Global Gaming Expo (G2E) in Las Vegas and the SBC Summit in Lisbon.
Independence Is the Condition Regulators Have Accepted, and Will Keep Testing
Gaming regulators approve labs one at a time, and the value of a certificate rests on the lab being independent of the supplier it certifies. Visualize's answer to common ownership is structural: each lab keeps its own accreditation, standards, methodologies and decision-making. That promise is what the unnamed regulators have evidently accepted, and it is also what they will watch. Two sister labs with overlapping online coverage raise questions that a single lab does not: whether a supplier refused by one could be steered to the other, whether test results or client information move between them, and whether one owner's commercial targets shape how either lab behaves. None of that has been alleged. But the safeguards are internal, and the release does not describe how they will be audited.

Private Equity Has Found the Toll Booth, and Suppliers Will Pay the Tolls
Visualize is unusually candid about its thesis. In March Ike described TICC as "the certification and compliance layer that every product must pass through before it can reach market", and said BMM's licences represent "a moat that would take a new entrant decades and significant capital to replicate". That is a description of pricing power. The firms promise faster turnaround and more capacity, and those promises should be measured against what suppliers actually experience. Testing fees are a small share of a game studio's costs but sit on the critical path to every launch, and a market with fewer, larger owners gives suppliers fewer places to go when a lab is slow. The employee ownership programme and the investment pledges are the firm's own framing, and remain commitments rather than results.
The 800-Jurisdiction Figure Is a Count of Approvals, Not of Markets
There are not 800 countries with regulated gambling. The figure aggregates licences and accreditations across states, provinces, tribal authorities, lotteries and national regulators, and across two labs whose own counts were "more than 700" licences for BMM in March and between 47 and "more than 50" jurisdictions for eCOGRA. It measures breadth of paperwork, which matters to suppliers entering new markets, but it is not a measure of market coverage and should not be compared with a rival's headline count without knowing how each was built.
The Market Now Has Two Consolidators
GLI has spent a decade buying: NMi Gaming in 2017, SIQ in Slovenia in 2022, iTech Labs in 2023 and Trisigma in 2024, according to its own history. Visualize has now assembled the second group, with land-based depth from BMM and online certification from eCOGRA, in seven months. The remaining independent labs are the obvious candidates for further deals, and the firm's own language about building "the leading gaming TICC platform" suggests it is not finished.
Visualize has bought the two labs without saying what it paid for either. What it will be judged on is whether the independence it has promised regulators survives the growth it has promised investors.


