Skip to content
iGaming Times

Independent industry intelligence in your inbox. We will email you a link to confirm your subscription, and every newsletter carries a one-click unsubscribe link.

General

Only 26.5% of Australians Know BetStop Exists, Consumer Advocate's Report Says

Antonina TupikovaBy Antonina Tupikova · Founder, iGaming Times3 min read
Sydney opera house harbour skyline

A consumer-advocate report collects what is publicly known about the national self-exclusion register: awareness at a quarter of adults and a third of bettors, fifteen operators caught breaching it, one of them more than 100,000 times, three financial penalties, and an Entain case the regulator investigated past its own 12-month limit.

  • Only 26.5% of Australian adults are aware BetStop exists, according to an Australian Institute of Family Studies report, and an Australian Gambling Research Centre report found just one in three bettors know of the register, figures cited in a report by consumer advocate Adam Glezer of Consumer Champion and covered by SBC News
  • "Fifteen companies have been caught breaching self exclusion, one of them, Unibet, over 100,000 times on its own, and only three have ever been fined," Glezer said. "That's not deterrence. That's a licence to keep doing it"
  • At the time of the report the Australian Communications and Media Authority had issued two financial penalties for BetStop breaches, despite at least a dozen distinct wagering operators being found in breach since launch; an Entain case involving about 500 breaches exceeded the statutory 12-month investigation limit and could not be fined
  • The ACMA's three largest settlements against gambling firms were for non-gambling matters: Tabcorp AU$4 million for spam in June 2025 and AU$2.7 million for spam and do-not-call breaches in July 2026, and Sportsbet AU$2.5 million for spam in February 2022
  • BetStop's operator Dataworks has fallen from about AU$6.43 a share at its 2017 listing to AU$0.12, with a statutory loss after tax of AU$2.25 million in FY26 against AU$10.03 million in FY25, and has raised commitments of AU$4.24 million before costs

The Register Works If You Know About It, and Three Quarters of Australians Do Not

Australia's national self-exclusion register has become the focus of a consumer-advocate report arguing that the country's gambling regulation is not doing what the public thinks it does. The report, by Adam Glezer of Consumer Champion and covered by SBC News, pulls together published research and enforcement records on BetStop, which lets a person block themselves from every licensed online wagering operator in the country at once.

Awareness is the first problem. An Australian Institute of Family Studies report found that 26.5% of Australian adults are aware BetStop exists. An Australian Gambling Research Centre report found that just one in three actual bettors knows of the register. A self-exclusion scheme that reaches everyone who signs up is of no use to the majority who do not know it is there.

iGaming glossary: 430+ terms explained.

Enforcement is the second. "Fifteen companies have been caught breaching self exclusion, one of them, Unibet, over 100,000 times on its own, and only three have ever been fined," Glezer said. "That's not deterrence. That's a licence to keep doing it. It's letting everyone know that a blind eye is turned to breaches in Australia, which only incentivises unscrupulous providers to keep doing it, as the risk is minimal." At the time his report was published, the Australian Communications and Media Authority had issued two financial penalties for BetStop breaches, against at least a dozen distinct operators found in breach since the register launched. He cited an Entain case involving about 500 breaches that the ACMA took so long to investigate that the statutory 12-month limit expired before a fine could be levied.

The comparison he draws is with the regulator's largest actions, none of which concerned gambling conduct: Tabcorp paid AU$4 million for spam in June 2025 and AU$2.7 million for spam and do-not-call breaches in July 2026, and Sportsbet AU$2.5 million for spam in February 2022. The ACMA is the de facto national gambling regulator alongside its media and communications remit, with substantive regulation otherwise sitting with the states; a single national regulator was a flagship recommendation of the 2023 Murphy report, whose 31 recommendations the Albanese government has not adopted in full, preferring partial measures such as a three-per-hour advertising cap to the blanket ban that polling cited in the report puts at 76% to 77% support.

Glezer also questions the position of BetStop's operator. Dataworks listed in 2017 at about AU$6.43 a share and trades at AU$0.12; it recorded a statutory loss after tax of AU$2.25 million in FY26, an improvement on AU$10.03 million in FY25, held AU$651,308 in cash at 30 June, and has since received firm commitments to raise AU$4.24 million before costs, alongside positive statutory operating cash flow of AU$1.91 million in FY26. "Its long term prospects don't fill me with confidence," he said. He also objects to Ian Penrose sitting as a non-executive director of Dataworks while serving as senior independent director of the London-listed supplier Playtech.

iGaming glossary: 430+ terms explained.

An Awareness Number That Low Makes the Register a Policy, Not a Protection

BetStop was the headline commitment of Australia's last round of online gambling reform, and on the published evidence two thirds of the people it exists for have never heard of it. Operators are required to carry the branding, but a person deciding at 2am whether to stop has to know a national register exists before any of the design matters. Britain requires GAMSTOP signposting at registration and in marketing, and the numbers here suggest Australia has built the register without the promotion, which is the cheapest half of the policy to deliver.

A Twelve-Month Investigation Clock Is a Compliance Strategy for Somebody

The detail that should worry the ACMA most is the Entain case that timed out. A statutory limitation period on investigations, in a regime where breaches are detected by the regulator rather than self-reported, creates an incentive that any general counsel can see: contest, extend, and run the clock. Fifteen operators caught and three fined is a ratio the regulator has not explained, and the register's value depends on operators believing that ignoring it is expensive. On these figures it is not.

The Financial Position of the Register's Operator Is the State's Problem, Not the Market's

Dataworks' share price and losses are a matter for its investors, and its recent raise and positive operating cash flow suggest a company stabilising rather than failing. The relevant question is different: critical public safety infrastructure is operated by a microcap, and no continuity plan for the register's data has been published. The Playtech board overlap Glezer raises is a governance question worth answering openly; the continuity question is the one a minister should already have an answer to.

Australia built the register and did not tell the country it exists, then caught fifteen operators ignoring it and fined three. Each of those facts is more damaging to the scheme than the advertising debate it was meant to settle.

Comments

Be the first to comment.

Cookie Preferences

Choose which cookies you want to accept. Essential cookies are required for the website to function properly.

Required

Necessary for the website to function. Cannot be disabled.

Help us understand how visitors interact with our website.

Used to deliver relevant advertisements and track ad performance.

Remember your preferences and settings for a better experience.