Skip to content
iGaming Times

Independent industry intelligence in your inbox. Unsubscribe any time - every newsletter carries a one-click link.

Prediction Markets

NFL Puts Its Prediction Market Ad Ban on the Record and Fences In Sportsbooks

Antonina TupikovaBy Antonina Tupikova · Founder, iGaming Times3 min read

For eight months the league's policy rested on one anonymously sourced report. Now its communications director has spelled it out: no prediction market advertising in games, stadiums, club deals or player endorsements, and sportsbook partners may only advertise an approved product, not the company.

  • "All prediction market advertising during NFL games is prohibited," the league's director of communications Tim Schlittner told Gambling Insider, extending the ban to in-stadium signage, club sponsorships and player endorsements
  • Sportsbook partners "must advertise one of their approved products", cannot do "general advertising" and cannot advertise prediction markets, and must license official league data
  • The policy had previously rested on a January Front Office Sports report citing an anonymous source; the league's chief revenue officer had said only that prediction markets were "not a space that we're considering right now commercially"
  • DraftKings says its nationwide "available in all 50 states" campaign does not air in NFL windows and that every spot it runs in them is pre-cleared by the league
  • Commissioner Roger Goodell told CNBC the league is still talking to prediction markets about "the things that we think they need to do" to become partners, and wants "stronger regulations" first; the NHL, MLB and MLS have already signed exchange deals

The League Has Finally Said What It Was Assumed to Be Doing

The National Football League prohibits all prediction market advertising during its games, and extends that prohibition to in-stadium signage, club sponsorships and player endorsements, its director of communications Tim Schlittner confirmed in emailed comments to Gambling Insider this week. It is the first time the league has stated the policy on the record. Until now, public understanding rested on a January report by Front Office Sports citing an anonymous source who said prediction markets sat on the league's unpublished list of prohibited advertising categories alongside tobacco, pornography and firearms. The league had neither published the list nor commented on it, and chief revenue officer Renie Anderson had said only that prediction markets were "not a space that we're considering right now commercially".

Schlittner also set out, for the first time, the rules that apply to the sportsbooks the league does allow to advertise. "During NFL games, sportsbook partners must advertise one of their approved products," he said. "They cannot do general advertising. They cannot advertise prediction markets." Partners are also required to license official league data "as part of our comprehensive game integrity protocols".

The distinction matters because all three of the league's official sportsbook partners run prediction markets. The multiyear deals with DraftKings, FanDuel and Fanatics announced in late August grant official data, in-game advertising and use of league marks, and ESPN reported at the time that the rights do not transfer to the companies' event-contract products. The league's statement makes the mechanism explicit: the entitlement attaches to an approved product, and a spot that sells the company rather than the product is out of bounds.

DraftKings, whose "Take Your Game Anywhere" brand campaign launched on 31 August on the premise that the company is "available in all 50 states" through its sportsbook and predictions products combined, told Gambling Insider the campaign does not run in NFL windows. Stephen Miraglia, its senior director of communications, said the league "has made clear" that creative airing during NFL programming must comply with guidelines it provides to partners, that DraftKings follows that direction, and that the advertising it runs in NFL windows "has received approval from the NFL". Outside those windows the nationwide campaign airs; inside them, "it's not going to get aired".

The NFL Is Now the Outlier Among the Leagues It Used to Lead

The NFL's position is not the industry's. The NHL signed both Kalshi and Polymarket at league level last October, Major League Baseball made Polymarket its official prediction market in March, and Major League Soccer did the same in January, according to Gambling Insider. Kalshi has signed five MLB clubs for signage, radio and, at Dodger Stadium, a bar's naming rights, placements of the kind the NFL says it prohibits. The NBA has signed nothing.

The stance tracks the league's regulatory position. In July it told the Commodity Futures Trading Commission that proposed prediction market rules "fall significantly short", and on 3 September chief compliance officer Sabrina Perel wrote to exchanges again about contracts the league regards as objectionable. Commissioner Roger Goodell said in a recent CNBC interview that the league is "continuing to have conversations with them and talk to them about the things that we think they need to do to strengthen that so that they could be potential partners at some point in the future", and that "there needs to be stronger regulations into the prediction markets" to protect the integrity of the game and consumers on the platforms. Casino.org, which reported the interview, notes the objectionable categories include contracts on player injuries and officials' calls; Novig said last week it would not offer "easily manipulable, inherently objectionable, officiating-related, and knowable in advance" contracts on NFL games.

Two things the league still has not said, as Gambling Insider notes: whether the reported prohibited-categories list exists in the form described, and how a product becomes "approved".

Licensing the Product, Not the Company, Is the Whole Design

The clever part of the NFL's construction is that it does not require the league to pick a fight with DraftKings, FanDuel or Fanatics over their exchanges. It simply defines the entitlement narrowly enough that the exchanges never touch it. A partner can be in all 50 states on Sunday morning and, by kick-off, only in the states where its sportsbook holds a licence. That protects the league's position with the state regulators and tribal governments it has sided with in Washington, without costing it the three largest sportsbook cheques in American sport. The operators have accepted it because the alternative was no NFL rights at all, which is the leverage a league with $23 billion of annual revenue, on Casino.org's figure, can exert and most others cannot.

A League Is Doing the Line-Drawing the CFTC Will Not

The NFL's July comment letter said the commission's proposed rules fall short, and its answer has been to write its own: no injury contracts, no officiating contracts, no advertising, no signage, and a partner list on which a product is either approved or not. That is a private regulatory regime, enforceable only through contracts and broadcast windows, and it is more restrictive than anything the CFTC has adopted. It will hold exactly as long as the league's commercial calculus does. Goodell's phrasing, that exchanges could be "potential partners at some point in the future", is not a refusal but a price, and the record NFL volumes Kalshi is posting without a licence are what the league is being asked to keep saying no to.

The Fence Has Gaps the Size of a Television Schedule

The ban is on NFL games, NFL stadiums, NFL clubs and NFL players. It is not on the audience, which watches the same channels an hour later, and DraftKings has confirmed the 50-state campaign airs there. Kalshi and Polymarket do not need the league's inventory to reach its fans, only its schedule, and a policy that keeps exchange branding out of the broadcast while the exchanges set volume records on the same games is a policy about the league's image rather than the market's shape. That is a legitimate thing for a league to protect. It is not the same as oversight, and the NFL knows the difference, which is why it keeps asking Washington for the real thing.

The NFL has written down the rule everyone assumed it had. What it has not written down is what would change it, and that is the document the exchanges are waiting for.

Comments

Be the first to comment.

Cookie Preferences

Choose which cookies you want to accept. Essential cookies are required for the website to function properly.

Required

Necessary for the website to function. Cannot be disabled.

Help us understand how visitors interact with our website.

Used to deliver relevant advertisements and track ad performance.

Remember your preferences and settings for a better experience.