Skip to content
iGaming Times

Choose your emails

Which emails would you like?

Independent industry intelligence in your inbox. We will email you a link to confirm the emails you ticked, and every email carries a one-click unsubscribe link. Each list can be left on its own.

Prediction Markets

Utah Files 14 Criminal Counts Against Kalshi and Its Founders Over Sports Wagers

Antonina TupikovaBy Antonina Tupikova · Founder, iGaming Times2 min read
Scales of justice and a judge's gavel on a wooden desk, with a person reading papers behind

Utah's attorney general has charged Kalshi and co-founders Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara with felony gambling offences built on 12 sports wagers placed by an undercover agent. The criminal case arrives two days after the CFTC sued Utah to stop its civil action against the exchange.

  • Utah Attorney General Derek Brown has charged KalshiEX LLC, chief executive Tarek Mansour and chief operating officer Luana Lopes Lara in the Third Judicial District Court in Salt Lake County, by summons rather than arrest warrant
  • The information, dated 28 October, sets out one second-degree felony for a pattern of unlawful activity, 12 third-degree felonies for online gambling promotion and one class A misdemeanour
  • The counts rest on 12 sports wagers totalling $114.87 that an undercover agent placed from Utah in September
  • The case follows Utah's 20 October civil suit against Kalshi and two Susquehanna firms and comes two days after the CFTC sued Utah to halt it
  • Kalshi called the charges "a crazy overreach"; Utah is the second state to prosecute the company after Arizona in March, and no court has found any defendant guilty

Utah Charges Kalshi's Exchange and Both Founders Over 12 Sports Wagers

The charging document, a "Co-Defendant Information (Summons)" in the Third Judicial District Court, names KalshiEX LLC as defendant and Mansour and Lopes Lara as co-defendants. It was signed by Special Agent Scott Eggerman of the Attorney General's Office on 28 October. Reuters reports that no arrest warrants were issued.

Count 1 alleges a pattern of unlawful activity, a second-degree felony under Utah Code section 76-17-407. Counts 2 to 13 allege online gambling promotion under section 76-9-1404, a third-degree felony that covers anyone who "intentionally provides or offers to provide a form of online gambling to an individual in this state". Count 14 alleges gambling promotion under section 76-9-1405, a class A misdemeanour. The probable cause declaration alleges that Mansour and Lopes Lara each acquired or maintained control of Kalshi and conducted its affairs through a pattern of unlawful activity, citing their own public statements.

An Undercover Account and $114.87 in Wagers

According to the declaration, Eggerman opened an account on 13 September with a Utah address, phone number and bank, and confirmed his location before wagering. Between 13 and 24 September he placed 12 wagers from Salt Lake and Davis counties on NFL, college football, Major League Soccer, Major League Baseball and NHL events, including games involving Utah teams. Stakes ran from $4 to $30, and fees from $0.03 to $0.78. By the declaration's figures, the agent finished $25.10 down.

The declaration recounts that on 4 August Judge Robert J. Shelby of the US District Court for the District of Utah held that the Commodity Exchange Act does not pre-empt Utah's gambling laws as applied to Kalshi, and that the Tenth Circuit denied an injunction pending appeal on 8 September. It alleges that the defendants nonetheless "continued to provide or offer to provide online gambling" in Utah.

iGaming glossary: 430+ terms explained.

The statutory maximums are steep: a second-degree felony carries one to 15 years in prison, a third-degree felony up to five years and a class A misdemeanour up to 364 days. Individuals face fines of up to $10,000, $5,000 and $2,500 respectively; a corporation faces up to $20,000 per felony and $10,000 for a class A misdemeanour.

Brown said that "Gambling is illegal in Utah, whether you place the bet, run the game, or promote it", and that "being federally registered doesn't put a company above the law", according to Reuters. Kalshi said in a statement reported by Reuters and the Deseret News: "This is a crazy overreach; Utah is clearly playing politics. We look forward to putting a stop to this in court, just like we did in Arizona." Spokesperson Jacki McGavick told the Deseret News that "no single state should have a veto over" a national derivatives market overseen by the CFTC. The charges are allegations, and no court has found any defendant guilty.

Utah Has Built a Felony Case on Fees Worth a Few Dollars

Each wager is a count and each fee is pleaded as proceeds used to run the enterprise, so the state needed only a funded account and a fortnight of fixtures to build a racketeering-style charge. On the statute's terms, KalshiEX's maximum fine across all 14 counts is $270,000, against the $30.5 million to $61.1 million in Utah profits that the Deseret News reports the civil complaint seeks. The criminal case is about leverage, and the method can be repeated with every new account.

The Prosecution Is Narrower Than Arizona's and Sits on Firmer Ground

Arizona charged two Kalshi entities with 20 misdemeanours, four of them for election wagering, and a federal judge halted that prosecution in April at the CFTC's request, according to Reuters. Utah has charged felonies, kept to sports and named one corporate entity. It is also bringing the case in a state whose federal court has already ruled against Kalshi on pre-emption, with the Tenth Circuit refusing interim relief. The CFTC's Utah suit had no injunction motion on file as of 27 October.

Naming the Founders Changes the Risk for Every Executive

A second-degree felony is not a cost of doing business. By charging Mansour and Lopes Lara on the strength of their own public statements, Utah has made a Utah courtroom part of the price of serving Utah users. Crypto.com's OG.com, which has already sued Utah pre-emptively, and every other platform with Utah customers can read the information as addressed to their own officers too.

Utah has turned a federal pre-emption fight into a personal criminal matter for two founders. The Tenth Circuit will decide whether it holds, but the state has already raised the cost of staying in its market.

Sources

Citations and primary documents this article references. Captured at the time of writing.

Comments

Be the first to comment.

Cookie Preferences

Choose which cookies you want to accept. Essential cookies are required for the website to function properly.

Required

Necessary for the website to function. Cannot be disabled.

Help us understand how visitors interact with our website.

Used to deliver relevant advertisements and track ad performance.

Remember your preferences and settings for a better experience.