Skip to content
iGaming Times

Choose your emails

Which emails would you like?

Independent industry intelligence in your inbox. We will email you a link to confirm the emails you ticked, and every email carries a one-click unsubscribe link. Each list can be left on its own.

Regulatory

Former Conservative Campaign Director Among Three Given Suspended Sentences Over Election Date Bets

Antonina TupikovaBy Antonina Tupikova · Founder, iGaming Times3 min read
Britain's Gambling Tax Shock: The Spiral Nobody Can Stop

Anthony Lee, his wife Laura Lee and Amy Hind avoided immediate custody at Southwark Crown Court after admitting cheating under section 42 of the Gambling Act 2005. The Gambling Commission calls it the first case of its kind, and 10 more defendants are still to stand trial.

  • Anthony Lee, the Conservative Party's former Director of Campaigning, received 10 months and two weeks' imprisonment suspended for 12 months at Southwark Crown Court on 23 October, according to the Gambling Commission
  • Laura Lee received four months and two weeks and Amy Hind six months, both suspended, and all three must do unpaid work and are barred from online gambling apps for 12 months
  • All three had pleaded guilty to cheating under section 42 of the Gambling Act 2005 over bets on the date of the 2024 General Election, placed before Rishi Sunak announced it on 22 May 2024
  • The Commission charged 15 people in April 2025; former MP Craig Williams has also pleaded guilty and will be sentenced later
  • Ten defendants, who pleaded not guilty, are due to stand trial in September 2027 and January 2028

Three Suspended Sentences in the Commission's First Election Betting Case

Anthony Lee, Laura Lee and Amy Hind were sentenced at Southwark Crown Court on Friday 23 October, having pleaded guilty to offences under section 42 of the Gambling Act 2005, the Gambling Commission said. Anthony Lee received 10 months and two weeks' imprisonment on each count, concurrent, with 100 hours of unpaid work; Laura Lee four months and two weeks with 40 hours; and Hind six months with 50 hours. Each sentence is suspended for 12 months.

All three are subject to a probation requirement for 12 months and a prohibited activity requirement barring them from using online gambling applications for the same period, according to the Commission. The Lees must each pay £1,000 in prosecution costs; no costs order was made against Hind. Section 42 carries up to two years' imprisonment, a fine or both on indictment.

The court heard that before Sunak announced the date on 22 May 2024, a 4 July poll had been planned at 10 Downing Street and Conservative Campaign Headquarters while operators offered markets on the timing. According to the Commission, Anthony Lee, the party's Director of Campaigning, was party to confidential discussions about the date, used that information to bet and passed it to his wife. Laura Lee, then the party's Head of International and its candidate for Bristol North-West, bet using that information. Hind, who had previously worked for the party and was working for the NHS at the time, bet after receiving confidential information about when the election would be called.

iGaming glossary: 430+ terms explained.

What the Court Heard About the Bets

The Lees placed bets totalling more than £2,000 between 10 March and 21 May 2024 that could have returned more than £23,000, the court heard, according to the Racing Post. Anthony Lee placed or attempted 71 bets totalling £1,773.78 across 21 incidents, 69 of them on a July election or one between July and September; Laura Lee made eight, including a £100 bet the day before the announcement. Prosecutor Zoe Johnson KC said Lee "abused" confidential information "to make a personal financial gain"; his barrister, Richard Pratt KC, said Lee did not know the working date for sure and that it "still represented a gamble from his point of view".

Hind, then a business support manager at the NHS Counter Fraud Authority, placed or attempted seven bets between 22 April and 14 May 2024 with three bookmakers, staking £135 for potential returns of about £1,380, the Racing Post reported. Her husband, Anthony Hind, was a Conservative deputy digital director; a charge against him for passing information to her was dropped in June, the Associated Press reported.

Katharine Diamond, the Commission's General Counsel, called it "a significant case and a first of its kind for the Commission", saying betting markets "must not be undermined by people using confidential information for their own benefit".

Fifteen Charged, Four Guilty Pleas, 10 Trials to Come

The Commission opened its investigation in June 2024 and charged 15 people in April 2025, noting that its case was separate from an earlier Metropolitan Police investigation, which was discontinued. Craig Williams, Sunak's former Parliamentary Private Secretary and MP for Montgomeryshire until May 2024, pleaded guilty on 29 June 2026 and will be sentenced later; the prosecution said three further charges he denies will be dropped then, the AP reported. The case surfaced after Ladbrokes referred Williams's bets having flagged him as a politically exposed person, iGaming Business reported.

iGaming glossary: 430+ terms explained.

Simon Chatfield, Paul Place, Iain Makepeace, James Ward, Thomas James, Russell George, Charlotte Lang, Jacob Willmer, Jeremy Hunt and Nick Mason remain charged and are due to stand trial in September 2027 and January 2028, according to the Commission. The Commission's charging notice listed Hunt as a former police officer.

The Convictions Matter More Than the Suspended Terms

Nobody went to prison, and the terms sit well short of the two-year maximum. But section 42, usually associated with interference in an event or the gambling process, has now produced convictions for betting on information the market did not have. Four people have accepted that betting on confidential knowledge of a political decision is cheating. For anyone who sits close to a decision that bookmakers price, that is a clearer line than existed in 2024.

Political Markets Have Few Insiders, Which Makes Them Easier to Police

A sports market can have thousands of people with partial knowledge; an election date market has a small circle who actually know. That made this case detectable, with an operator flagging a politically exposed customer. IG Group has applied for a gambling licence and expects to add politics markets in early 2027, and US election officials are already moving to bar poll workers from trading on the midterms. An exchange matching users against each other needs the same insider controls a bookmaker applied here.

The Larger Test Is Still Two Trials Away

Every conviction so far has come from a guilty plea. The 10 who deny the charges will be tried in 2027 and 2028, more than three years after the bets, and Williams has yet to be sentenced. Whether section 42 holds up when the defence contests what a defendant knew and when, rather than conceding it, is the question the trials will answer.

The Commission has convictions and a precedent from its first political betting prosecution. Ten contested cases will decide whether it has a deterrent.

Sources

Citations and primary documents this article references. Captured at the time of writing.

Comments

Be the first to comment.

Cookie Preferences

Choose which cookies you want to accept. Essential cookies are required for the website to function properly.

Required

Necessary for the website to function. Cannot be disabled.

Help us understand how visitors interact with our website.

Used to deliver relevant advertisements and track ad performance.

Remember your preferences and settings for a better experience.